Jillian C. York

Jillian C. York is a writer and activist.

Month: June 2011 (page 1 of 2)

Testing Google+

This morning, not an hour after tweeting my excitement, I received a surprise in my inbox: an invite to Google+. Though the timing was sheer coincidence (no, Google is not reading my tweets, or my mind…yet), the semi-instant gratification was pleasing.

After a quick login (including a checkbox giving Google+ permission to access your Picasa photos), I was in and exploring. The first thing I noticed was Circles, friend classifications Diaspora-like in their simplicity. All in the image below are standard, save for “Professional Connections” on the far right.

In order to add friends to your network (and, in fact, to discover whether they’re on the site yet at all), you must add them to one of your circles.

Shortly after logging in, I received notification that my friend Gilad had added me to his circle. I added him back and we gave the site’s “hangouts” a test run. A hangout is a chat room of sorts for up to ten people that uses video and text. Aside from giving my MacBook a hernia (seriously, I thought the thing was going to take off, it was so loud), the “hangout” was pretty cool:

One thing Gilad noticed was that the community policing mechanism. If you hover over a user’s image while in the hangout, you’ll see a red hand. Click on it, and you’re given the abuse reporting mechanism:

While I absolutely love the fact that you can upload a screenshot (thus providing actual evidence of abuse, rather than hearsay that could potentially kick someone off the system), I’m a bit confused about the options. Are hangouts really a place you’ll chat with people you don’t know? I suppose a friend could invite me and 8 others I’ve never met, and that one of those individuals could do something lewd, but nonetheless…it seems a bit odd for a social network of this type. I also wonder if Google+ will have its own, socially-oriented TOS, or if it will rely on Google’s overbroad TOS.

And no, I didn’t report Gilad.

Another feature of the site is the “Stream” (wonder what Al Jazeera will think of that name): essentially, your status update. What’s cool about it is how easy it is to send status updates to a particular group:

That’s a feature I really appreciate; what’s always bothered me about Facebook is the fact that I find it very difficult to manipulate my different “groups.” For example, I once tried blocking a person from viewing individual photo albums, but found that she wasn’t able to see any of the albums. Not very effective.

The “Circles” system makes it easy for me to share personal updates with friends and professional updates with colleagues. It’s also easy to add a person to two different circles.

So far, Google+ appears to have incorporated the best features of other social networking sites into one. I’m not sure that I’d ever be convinced to start using Picasa or the Google+ photos feature regularly (I only use Facebook for snapshots, for example, while Flickr is mainly for travel photos), and I’m not convinced that my fairly new MacBook Pro can handle the hangout without exploding, but aside from that, I’m pretty impressed so far. Now, if only Google would send invites to the rest of my friends!

Facebook: Still No Automated Systems?

Facebook has long claimed that their community policing system cannot be gamed, and that pages are not automatically removed for TOS violations, despite evidence to the contrary. Today, more evidence, as famed critic and blogger Roger Ebert’s Facebook Page is removed, allegedly for being “hateful, threatening, or obscene.”

As Ebert writes, he was recently the subject of controversy after admonishing recently deceased Ryan Dunn for driving drunk. Though Ebert states he did not post to his Facebook wall about the controversy, he believes he was targeted by angry fans of Dunn’s program Jackass.

As I’ve written before, I firmly believe that, at a certain number of reports, Facebook’s systems “tip” in favor of the reporting, bringing down a Page or profile. While the company has denied that, I can’t possibly come up with any alternative explanation for why Ebert’s page–or Sarah Palin’s page before it–would be removed.

Note: Once again, Facebook states that the Page was removed “in error.” But why? What triggered that error? Utter incompetence or automated systems?

Older posts

© 2018 Jillian C. York

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑