Jillian C. York

Jillian C. York is a writer and activist.

Month: November 2010 (page 1 of 3)

Facebook and Identification: Caught in a Lie?

In the Wall Street Journal, Geoffrey Fowler has a piece on Facebook asking for real-life identification. Due to a recent bout of spamming, Facebook asked a number of users to verify their identity by submitting–on the site–a copy of their real-life identification. I’ve been aware of this for some time, but here’s what I found particularly interesting:

Facebook says it will only seek to verify ID on the site — never by email. “We deliberately don’t send an email so that people don’t think it’s a scam,” said Axten. First you have to log in with your correct password, and then you would see a message telling you that your account is disabled with a link to a page in Facebook’s Help Center.

Actually, that’s simply untrue. While Facebook may have changed that policy, they most certainly have asked users to submit identification via e-mail in the past. As I described in my recent paper, Policing Content in the Quasi-Public Sphere, Facebook users whose names seem fake or questionable (or who are clearly using a fake name) have been asked to submit identification to prove their identity, in line with Facebook’s real name policy. The following email was shared with me by Najat Kessler, a Facebook user whose (very real) cross-cultural name was clearly too strange for Facebook (or, more likely, whose name was reported by other users as being fake). Note the date.

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:23 PM, The Facebook Team wrote:

Hi,

At this time, we cannot verify the ownership of the account under this address. Please reply to this email with a scanned image of a government-issued photo ID (e.g., driver’s license) in order to confirm your ownership of the account. Please black out any personal information that is not needed to verify your identity (e.g., social security number). Rest assured that we will permanently delete your ID from our servers once we have used it to verify the authenticity of your account.

Please keep in mind that fake accounts are a violation of our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Facebook requires users to provide their real first and last names. Impersonating anyone or anything is prohibited.

In addition to your photo ID, please include all of our previous correspondence in your response so that we can refer to your original email. Once we have received this information, we will reevaluate the status of the account. Please note that we will not be able to process your request unless you send in proper identification. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Thanks,

Dominique
User Operations
Facebook

This begs a few questions: Did Facebook in fact change their policy? Why act like this is a new thing? Also, while I understand the need to eliminate spam, Facebook must surely be aware that their site is rife with fake accounts; one need only search “Santa Claus” to see just how many. And yet, according to the BBC, Facebook actually blocks certain words (such as “Beta”) from being used as names…even if they are real.

While I find Facebook’s policy toward real names ludicrously out of touch, I recognize that it’s their right as a company to stand by it. Nevertheless, I don’t think it’s acceptable for users to submit identification over the Web (and given that Facebook does not use HTTPS by default–something I doubt most users are aware of–it becomes significantly more troublesome). As Fowler said in his piece, advice worth repeating yet again: “sending a copy of your ID over email is probably never a good idea.”

(Ed note: Apparently, submitting confidential information over e-mail networks is also in violation of my employer’s–Harvard’s–policies!)

Facebook and Saudi Arabia

I went offline for this weekend (complete radio silence) for the first time in years.  Of course, during that time, Saudi Arabia had to go and block Facebook the media went crazy reporting that Saudi Arabia blocked Facebook, but Saudi netizens are saying there was no actual block.  And then unblock Facebook.  It’s almost as if it didn’t even happen!

Blocking Facebook would put Saudi Arabia in a class with Syria, Iran, and China.  Unblocking it puts it on par with Pakistan and Bangladesh, two countries which have pulled the same shenanigans.

It’s not surprising that Saudi would block Facebook; the country’s filtering is already pervasive.  It’s somewhat more interesting that the ban didn’t last–what incentive do authorities possibly have to keep the site online?  One guess is that keeping Facebook online better allows the state to monitor its citizens.

In any case, blocking Facebook would likely have few implications in Saudi, where VPNs seem to reign supreme, whereas keeping it available might just pacify young citizens enough to keep them quiet.

It Gets Better

I’ve been following the It Gets Better project and wishing I had something new to say about it; I don’t, but that’s okay–the hundreds of gay, lesbian, straight, bi, trans, and questioning folks who have recorded videos for the project have said so much already, and I’d rather share their words anyhow (I also donated, and recommend that you do too; donations benefit the Trevor Project’s Suicide Prevention hotline).

I’d also like to share three videos that have caught my attention.  Though no one is immune to homophobia, it often manifests itself with such vitriol in religious communities, due to deeply held beliefs that homosexuality is wrong, forbidden, a sin. That’s why I particularly commend the folks in these three videos, for speaking out and sharing their stories and telling youth in their communities that yes, it does get better.

First, from Pastor James Campbell of the Broadway United Church of Christ:

A group of young, gay Orthodox Jews share their stories:

A young Pakistani Muslim:

Older posts

Creative Commons License
Jillian C. York by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑