<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jillian C. York &#187; oni</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jilliancyork.com/tag/oni/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jilliancyork.com</link>
	<description>Jillian C. York is a freelance writer and blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Policing Content in the Quasi-Public Sphere</title>
		<link>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/09/21/policing-content-in-the-quasi-public-sphere-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/09/21/policing-content-in-the-quasi-public-sphere-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account deactivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policing content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jilliancyork.com/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, the paper I&#8217;ve been working on since (gulp) April is now live on the OpenNet Initiative website: &#8220;Policing Content in the Quasi-Public Sphere&#8221; tackles the issues of content regulation and account deactivations across five popular social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and Blogger).  The paper is also available for PDF download [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At long last, the paper I&#8217;ve been working on since (gulp) April is now live on the OpenNet Initiative website: &#8220;<a href="http://opennet.net/policing-content-quasi-public-sphere">Policing Content in the Quasi-Public Sphere</a>&#8221; tackles the issues of content regulation and account deactivations across five popular social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and Blogger).  The paper is also available for <a href="http://opennet.net/sites/opennet.net/files/PolicingContent.pdf">PDF download</a> (my preference; the images don&#8217;t seem to be showing up properly on the site, will get that fixed ASAP).</p>
<p>On a similar topic, I was quoted in a recent <em> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42364.html">Politico</a></em><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42364.html"> piece</a> on activists&#8217; frustration with the Facebook platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/09/21/policing-content-in-the-quasi-public-sphere-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN Security Bans ONI Poster from IGF</title>
		<link>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/11/16/un-security-bans-oni-poster-from-igf/</link>
		<comments>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/11/16/un-security-bans-oni-poster-from-igf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IGF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IGF2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONIAsia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jilliancyork.com/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rarely do I cross-post from elsewhere onto my own blog, however, this warrants widespread discussion.  From the ONI blog: Whilst attending the Internet Governance Forum in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, the OpenNet Initiative (along with partners of ONI Asia) gathered to present their upcoming book, Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-735" title="AC-banner-sm" src="http://jilliancyork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/AC-banner-sm-222x520.png" alt="AC-banner-sm" width="222" height="520" />Rarely do I cross-post from elsewhere onto my own blog, however, this warrants widespread discussion.  From the </em><em><a href="http://opennet.net/blog/2009/11/un-security-forces-removal-oni-poster">ONI blog</a>:</em></p>
<p>Whilst attending the Internet Governance Forum in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, the OpenNet Initiative (along with partners of ONI Asia) gathered to present their upcoming book, <em>Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace</em>. A poster advertising the book was hung for the reception; UN security officials requested removal of the poster, which contained mention of China&#8217;s &#8220;Great Firewall.&#8221; When ONI officials refused to remove the poster, UN security bundled up the poster and took it away.</p>
<p>The sentence in question? &#8220;The first generation of Internet controls consisted largely of building firewalls at key Internet gateways; China’s famous ‘Great Firewall of China’ is one of the first national Internet filtering systems.&#8221;</p>
<p>OpenNet Initiative officials were told that the banner had to be removed because of its reference to China, a request repeated on several occasions, and in front of a number of witnesses, including the UN Special Rapporteur For Human Rights. Earlier, those same officials had asked ONI to stop circulating an invite to the event because it contained a mention of Tibet.</p>
<p>ONI officials requested to see governing rules pertaining to the act, however, UN security refused to provide them, with mention given to &#8220;objections of a member state.&#8221;</p>
<p>The incident has been covered in the major news media, most notably <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8361849.stm">by the BBC</a>, which quoted ONI Principal Investigator Ron Deibert as saying &#8220;If we are not allowed to discuss topics such as internet censorship, surveillance and privacy at a forum on internet governance, then what is the point of the IGF?&#8221; Deibert&#8217;s <a href="http://deibert.citizenlab.org/">web site</a> contains further information and will be updated to reflect new developments.</p>
<p><em>Access Controlled</em> is slated for release in early 2010.  Our previous volume, <em>Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering</em> is available <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Access-Denied-Filtering-Information-Revolution/dp/0262541963/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1258384517&amp;sr=8-4">on Amazon.com</a> and other booksellers; each chapter is also available individually <a href="http://opennet.net/accessdenied">online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/11/16/un-security-bans-oni-poster-from-igf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Herdict?</title>
		<link>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/03/02/do-you-herdict/</link>
		<comments>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/03/02/do-you-herdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan zittrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opennet initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdict of the herd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jilliancyork.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a bit behind in pushing this on my own blog, but since the launch last Wednesday, it&#8217;s been a massive whirlwind of excitement. Herdict.org, or Herdict Web uses crowdsourcing to gather information on Internet accessibility around the globe (which sometimes means filtering and sometimes doesn&#8217;t). As a part of the Herdict core team, I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit behind in pushing this on my own blog, but since the launch last Wednesday, it&#8217;s been a massive whirlwind of excitement.  <a href="http://herdict.org">Herdict.org</a>, or Herdict Web uses crowdsourcing to gather information on Internet accessibility around the globe (which sometimes means filtering and sometimes doesn&#8217;t).  As a part of the Herdict core team, I&#8217;m admittedly totally biased in saying this is one of the most fascinating and far-reaching projects to come out of Berkman since Global Voices.  As Herdict Web catches on with users around the globe, they&#8217;ll be able to compare accessibility in their country with other countries.  And while governments are typically inept at maintaining a sense of transparency about filtering, Herdict will hopefully allow users to fill in where government has left off.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get it?  Check out the video, subtitled in eight languages (so far) and narrated by Professor Jonathan Zittrain (who&#8217;s also the brains behind the idea).</p>
<p><iframe src="http://dotsub.com/media/fae94499-8a80-4cc8-b083-48b0d4d6298b/e/m" frameborder="0" width="420" height="347"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/03/02/do-you-herdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

