<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jillian C. York &#187; gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jilliancyork.com/tag/gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jilliancyork.com</link>
	<description>Jillian C. York is a freelance writer and blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(Talk) Vivek Wadhwa: &#8220;Entrepreneurship: where are all the women and minorities?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/07/20/talk-vivek-wadhwa-entrepreneurship-where-are-all-the-women-and-minorities/</link>
		<comments>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/07/20/talk-vivek-wadhwa-entrepreneurship-where-are-all-the-women-and-minorities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek Wadhwa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jilliancyork.com/?p=1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s Berkman luncheon hosted Vivek Wadhwa, a “a senior research associate with the Labor and Worklife Program at Harvard Law School, an executive in residence/adjunct professor at the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University, and a visiting scholar at the School of Information at University of California at Berkeley.” Wadhwa’s talk centered around entrepreneurship, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s <a href="https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheon/2010/07/wadhwa">Berkman luncheon</a> hosted <a href="http://wadhwa.com/blog/bio/">Vivek Wadhwa</a>, a “a senior research  associate with the Labor and Worklife Program at Harvard Law School, an  executive in residence/adjunct professor at the Pratt School of  Engineering at Duke University, and a visiting scholar at the School of  Information at University of California at Berkeley.”</p>
<p>Wadhwa’s talk centered  around entrepreneurship, and the general dearth of women and minorities  across a variety of industries, particularly tech (in fact, he cited a  stat that Blacks constitute only 1.4 percent and Latinos only 4.7  percent of Silicon Valley workforce).  Providing various statistics and  tidbits (90% of successful entrepreneurs did NOT raise venture capital;  entrepreneurs are not necessarily ivy league; tech entrepreneurs are  typically not young; average is age 40, married, with kids), Wadhwa  demonstrates that women and men entrepreneurs exhibit more similarities  than differences, but that women still lag far behind in the area of  entrepreneurship in general. Wadhwa also asks what’s stopping people  from becoming entrepreneurs?  The strongest factor in survey, for both  genders, is fear of failure or an unwillingness to take risks.</p>
<p>Wadhwa used a variety  of examples from the Indian community, sharing a personal story in which  he, looking to start up a company, approached various venture  capitalists, all to no avail.  Finally, frustrated, he approached an  Indian venture capitalist in Silicon Valley, who in turn advised him  then introduced him to several others, who, as he said, were “fighting  with each other to invest in his idea.”  When Wadhwa finally got the  chance to ask one why he hadn’t returned his calls in the first place,  he was told, “Because your people don’t make good CEOs.”  The moral of  the story?  Racism, as well as sexism is alive and well in the field.</p>
<p>Wadhwa also focused on  the issue of women as entrepreneurs more specifically, stating that  women entrepreneurs are generally slightly older than men, are similarly  likely to be married, but tend to be more educated and have better credentials.   If that is true, does that mean that it takes women more effort and  education to succeed?  I was live-tweeting the discussion, which  resulted in the question being asked by another Twitter user: “At my all  women&#8217;s university, our dean warned us we&#8217;d have to be twice as good to  be considered half as good. Still true?”</p>
<p>Looking at solutions  to the problem, various ideas were discussed; starting at the early  level.  He then introduced <a href="http://roshniacademy.org/">Roshni Academy </a>as an example; the  academy, based in New Delhi, works with young, rural, poor girls to help  teach them skills in entrepreneurship.  It was clear from the  interviews Wadhwa conducted with some of the students that the academy  is doing incredible things for some of these girls, but is short-term  intervention enough?  Will these girls succeed in the long run?</p>
<p>Bringing the  discussion back to the US, Wadhwa pointed out that in many cases, women  entrepreneurs are unlikely to help other women.  This point caused  several women attendees to speak up; some spoke of women playing so many  roles that they’re often too busy to play mentor as well.  Others  raised the point that once women achieve a certain level of success,  they’re often afraid to lose it and thus shy from helping other women.</p>
<p>Another attendee,  seated next to me, pointed out that young women (let’s say, Gen Y) are  less likely to identify as feminists and likely to criticize the  approach of earlier generations of women in breaking down barriers,  claiming that they were “too brash” or “too confrontational.”</p>
<p>Discussing the talk  later with two female colleagues, this particular point presented itself  again: Why are women of my generation so likely to renounce feminism?   One hypothesis is that (in the US, anyway) our landscape is just so  different from that of our mothers: We grew up with women in leadership  roles, and for many of us, college was encouraged, if not expected.   Thus, the barriers seem lesser now; we are less likely to fight loudly  because the types of barriers with which we are presented are less  institutional, more personal or local.</p>
<p>Here’s my thought on that: While it’s  true that many of us have had many “elite” opportunities (college, an  urban job landscape), the more successful we become, the more likely it  is (especially in certain fields) that we’ll hit a gender ceiling.   While it may not be true of our micro-environment (our office, our  company), even at higher levels, it could very well be true of our field  or our area of focus.</p>
<p>One final point discussed amongst my  colleagues was the idea of recognizing privilege: We may have access to  certain things our mothers didn’t, but who’s to say that’s true for all  American women, or beyond?</p>
<p>Finally, one thing I’m interested in is how  to address this issue globally without being patronizing or  neo-colonialist.  How can we realize and recognize the needs of women  worldwide, and support those women, without talking down to them or  imposing a Western ideal of feminism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jilliancyork.com/2010/07/20/talk-vivek-wadhwa-entrepreneurship-where-are-all-the-women-and-minorities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Diversity in Gender</title>
		<link>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/05/03/on-diversity-in-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/05/03/on-diversity-in-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FriendFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends with benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mona nomura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[societal norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jilliancyork.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I came across a comment from a total stranger on FriendFeed, a platform which &#8211; up until today &#8211; didn&#8217;t impress me much.  The comment, by Mona Nomura, was simply: Any female who says she is ok with being a &#8220;friend with benefits&#8221; is lying to themselves. Stop it, you&#8217;re worth more. Immediately, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I came across a comment from a total stranger on FriendFeed, a platform which &#8211; up until today &#8211; didn&#8217;t impress me much.  The comment, by <a href="http://friendfeed.com/monasfeed">Mona Nomura</a>, was simply:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any female who says she is ok with being a &#8220;friend with benefits&#8221; is lying to themselves. Stop it, you&#8217;re worth more.</p></blockquote>
<p>Immediately, I felt my usual angry fire rising up &#8211; not because I strongly disagree with her (I do, but that&#8217;s almost irrelevant), but because I can&#8217;t stand to see anyone make assumptions about an entire group of people.  Oddly enough, Mona&#8217;s assertion was based on her own frustration in the misuse of &#8220;equality&#8221; to imply that men and women are made entirely equal, with no emotional differences; I disagree with that assumption as well, but extend it further to state that not all women &#8211; or men &#8211; are equal to all others within their gender.</p>
<p>You can see, from the 100+ comments, that this is something many people feel strongly about, for one reason or another.  That, to me, demonstrates the wonderful diversity we have amongst us!  There are men who dream of marriage just like there are women who dream of unencumbered flings.  There are women who want to spend the rest of their lives with one partner, while there are men for whom marriage will never be an ideal.  There are those of us who put ourselves into a particular box because society tells us it&#8217;s right, only to discover that it won&#8217;t work for us.  There are others who fight so hard against societal norms, only to learn that those norms are what they actually believe in.</p>
<p>My point?  We&#8217;re all different.  We should stop boxing ourselves into gender stereotypes just as we should stop boxing ourselves into the lie that everyone is exactly equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jilliancyork.com/2009/05/03/on-diversity-in-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

